...that's none of her business!

She needs to know to make sure it doesn't increase community tensions, which are her responsibility as transition manager.

Well they need to go find who was making noise and shut them up, which is their responsibility as cops!

She doesn't hear any noise, perhaps they have already succeeded.

That's not good enough.

Have they never investigated a noise complaint in a building with private security before? Do they usually get into shoving matches with the private security?

This is not a building it is a red neighborhood.

The same procedures should apply. If she describes how they meant to identify the guilty party Isel can perhaps arrange for that person to come on out and accept their ticket and fine.

That's none of her business she has to let them in.

Her obligation is to ensure a peaceful red transition and she doesn't have enough information to evaluate whether this is going to impede that so she is in fact obliged not to let them in.

They're the cops and they're doing their jobs and they will force their way past her security if they have to.

If they try that she has to pay them a whole lot extra. Do the cops want to just skip that part and take a big bonus for their diligence and go solve other crimes more important than noise complaints.

Is she trying to bribe them to not do their jobs?! They are INSULTED.

Three thousand tap apiece.

INSULTED.

Then she will just have to offer it to her security staff as a bonus for preventing transition problems tonight. She calls the non-emergency police number.

"Rivik City police department," says the voice on the phone as her security and the cops square off.

"This is Isel. My security team is preventing hiccups in the transition, and the police are serving a noise complaint but have failed to specify the target of the complaint or the scope of the investigation. We need that information in order to ensure the training and replacement of reds proceeds smoothly and safely. Can you send someone down to mediate?"

"My location data indicates that there are already officers on the scene."

"Yes, that's the problem. They aren't able to specify the target or the scope, and I need that information for complaints served on my property."

"They should be in the process of identifying those facts now. I'm getting some reports of obstruction."

"Yes, my security team cannot let them onto my property without information about the process, the scope of the investigation, and their intended resolution. They were unable to provide that information, which is why I am calling."

"I assume they were planning to enter the neighborhood and question people until they were satisfied that the complaint had been appropriately delivered."

"Oh good! Are there any procedural concerns with escorting them and with videotaping them on my property in the process of delivering the complaint."

"Yes, that's disrespectful to the police process."