[a pair of closely related timelines argue with each other]
(Planet named) Earth : Are you even a real place?
(Planet named) Origin : Sufficiently?
Earth : ..... Hmmm... Feeling doubt.
Origin : It's a real specification for a place. An alternate-Earth... Suppose a process which could search among worlds by abstract & imperfect specification, that search could locate something very much like this place, sufficiently like this place, if said process is searching within in a complete simulation of our universe. We can't execute an isomorphic process ourselves, but we can... hypothesize the specification of a search.
Earth : We over here are not sold on the 'Many Worlds' quantum mechanics thing.
Origin : People here would say something like "Global Continuum of Causally-Related Configurations" - well, different naming conventions... suppose no one ever thought of the "Collapse" thing - what would've necessitated inventing that interpretation of "Schrodinger's Equation" - as you call it?
Earth : It didn't need to be motivated by anything in particular... Is the thing? It was a feeling, an intuition that something which preserved... normalcy... must be the answer. We observe ourselves being in one timeline, therefore other timelines are extraneous to modelling the world we find ourselves in, therefore they shouldn't appear in our models.
Origin : This seems contingent on a certain kind of critically-unexamined reflexive denial of "abnormalcy" was introduced at the wrong time, and the results of building models from that denial of "abnormalcy" was... sticky on your planet. The denial supposes access to a reliable formula which can be applied to separate descriptions of the universe into categories which preserve "normalcy" and are therefore more probable - and "abnormal" descriptions which are less probable. Instead of the rule returning "on" or "off" based on some other criteria which didn't reliably correspond to the operation of the universe.
Earth : Yes, we have gotten a lot of evidence that the universe ends up being well described by very normal looking models. If not by heuristics like that, what method should you use to choose the direction should you be looking in?
Origin : You could take a step back and review your heuristics, and also step back and analyze the meta-heuristics you operate to determine which heuristics to use, and regress in that sequence until the confusions you generate via that method have been resolved.
Earth : Did your philosophers really inculcate habits like that early enough for it to be instantly obvious where to take the exploration of Schrodinger's Equation after its formal specification was noticed?
Origin : The story of philosophy and science over here is slightly more complicated than "Earth but with subtly different emphasis on which habits to rely on in thought and discourse" - we chose a different number system, and, well, that decision turns out to have been pretty important. There are compounding effects of doing things... in a different way when you are laying a foundation.
Earth : We seem to have pretty solid foundations.
Origin : Perhaps, there aren't really obvious metrics via which to coordinate on deciding a "winner" between us... it's just different... two different answers that make sense to each of us in our own contexts. It... in the end doesn't really add up to dramatically different results. Our stories will be almost identical in the big picture - at least if those two stories could be evaluated from the perspective of the humans on our worlds. Y'know, if things like the humans were going to remain to be evaluating things.
Earth : That tone sounds "Doomy" - it does not sound like you're saying "we're both full of humans, our stories will be similar because there will be an obvious convergent answer both of our collections of humans will settle on independently." We're not really sure about that Doom thing, we're actually pretty sure we are basically guaranteed the opportunity to gradually figure things out - and if there's a right answer, we will eventually find it.
Origin : .....
Earth : It's pretty obvious there's not going to be an apocalypse. Having an apocalypse is not normal. People being wrong about an imminent apocalypse is normal.
Origin : We consider different things obvious about what the long-run story of our worlds will be, at least from where we have reached in the timeline.
"Origin" - or "Planet of Origin" - as it is sometimes known by the locals - has part of its history overlapping with Earth's past.
Yet, these places split long enough ago that Planet of Origin does not have a record of being called something quite like "Earth" - and things on Origin had already taken a substantially different shape by the "Early Bronze Age" equivalent.
They developed via a different culture, a different context. Different people being presented with different choices and using different methods to select among those decisions.
There emerged a subtly different memeplex of ideas by the time global intermixing occured on Origin.
One not so subtle difference was Origin taking up binary as the foundation of their system for counting and artithmetic. Among humans, impactful things can be built up on those foundations which are nearly inaccessible in any other underlying system.
Another difference would be... "A difference in attitude," would be a way to describe it. Temperament, culture, perspectives. There is a character to the mental motions present in Origin which is substantially diverged from analogies in Earth culture.
When a global civilization took root, there was already a different trajectory in play.
That trajectory plays out, and we narrow the view to a specific causal history for the world. Triumphs, tragedies, struggle, cooperation...
And then a substantial mistake. A single challenge with vastly higher stakes. There was something Origin missed, an answer they didn't find in time to change the outcome.
It wasn't... A fair challenge. They tried. The people of Origin were not blind to the danger. They knew to fight.
The struggle, in the end, simply did not suffice to win.
And so, the people on Origin ended up having a very bad day.
One of those people was trying to have the least-awful day that they could manage...